Monday, 31 October 2016

Doctor Faustus by Christopher Marlowe.

This October I joined the annual R.eaders I.mbibing P.eril, this year reading Inferno by Dante, Faust Part I by Goethe, Titus Andronicus by Shakespeare, and this, the final title (and a return to the Faust story): The Tragical History of the Life and Death of Doctor Faustus, a  tragedy by Christopher Marlowe first performed somewhere between 1588 and 1593. Being as it's Halloween today I thought it would be a good day to say a few words on it!

There are two versions of Marlowe's Faust; the first was published in 1604, and the second, the one I read, in 1616. This second text is longer, with additions by Samuel Rowley (author of When You See Me You Know Me, and possible collaborator with Shakespeare on The Taming of the Shrew) and William Birde. I dare say had I realised as I was reading it I might have preferred the first text, known as the "A Text" (the second being the "B Text"), but such is life.

The play begins with the prologue, like a Greek tragedy might, by telling the story of Doctor Faustus, a figure almost embodying Renaissance values, from his birth to the present point in the play:
Not marching now in fields of Thrasymene,
     Where Mars did mate the Carthaginians;
     Nor sporting in the dalliance of love,
     In courts of kings where state is overturn'd;
     Nor in the pomp of proud audacious deeds,
     Intends our Muse to vaunt her heavenly verse:
     Only this, gentlemen,—we must perform
     The form of Faustus' fortunes, good or bad:
     To patient judgments we appeal our plaud,
     And speak for Faustus in his infancy.
     Now is he born, his parents base of stock,
     In Germany, within a town call'd Rhodes:
     Of riper years, to Wertenberg he went,
     Whereas his kinsmen chiefly brought him up.
     So soon he profits in divinity,
     The fruitful plot of scholarism grac'd,
     That shortly he was grac'd with doctor's name,
     Excelling all whose sweet delight disputes
     In heavenly matters of theology;
     Till swoln with cunning, of a self-conceit,
     His waxen wings did mount above his reach,
     And, melting, heavens conspir'd his overthrow;
     For, falling to a devilish exercise,
     And glutted now with learning's golden gifts,
     He surfeits upon cursed necromancy;
     Nothing so sweet as magic is to him,
     Which he prefers before his chiefest bliss:
     And this the man that in his study sits.
The scene changes and we begin Act I with Faust in his study, dissatisfied with the limitations of knowledge and deciding he wishes to practise magic:
These metaphysics of magicians,
And necromantic books are heavenly;
Lines, circles, scenes, letters, and characters;
Ay, these are those that Faustus most desires.
O, what a world of profit and delight,
Of power, of honour, of omnipotence,
Is promis'd to the studious artizan!
All things that move between the quiet poles
Shall be at my command:  emperors and kings
Are but obeyed in their several provinces,
Nor can they raise the wind, or rend the clouds;
But his dominion that exceeds in this,
Stretcheth as far as doth the mind of man;
A sound magician is a mighty god:
Here, Faustus, tire thy brains to gain a deity.
Christopher Marlowe.
Having wrestled with his conscience, the Good and Evil Angel, he, with the help of his friends Valdes and Cornelius, learns to summon a devil, Mephastophilis. Faustus tells him,
Go bear these tidings to great Lucifer:
Seeing Faustus hath incurr'd eternal death
By desperate thoughts against Jove's deity,
Say, he surrenders up to him his soul,
So he will spare him four and twenty years,
Letting him live in all voluptuousness;
Having thee ever to attend on me,
To give me whatsoever I shall ask,
To tell me whatsoever I demand,
To slay mine enemies, and aid my friends,
And always be obedient to my will.
Go and return to mighty Lucifer,
And meet me in my study at midnight,
And then resolve me of thy master's mind.
From here we see Faustus, having even signed a contract in blood, struggle with his actions, all the while tempted by Mephastophilis who manages to keep his hold him. Faustus travels through Europe; Rome and Germany, performing magic tricks and evening summoning the image of Alexander the Great for Charles V of Germany, and generally causing chaos wherever he goes. At the same time his servant Wagner learns some magic of his own, conjuring a clown, Robin, who accompanies him.

Like Goethe's Faust it is a wonderful play, magical, vivid, and is very amusing at times. But Doctor Faustus is a tragedy: for twenty-four years Mephastophilis has been in Faustus' service, but at the end of it, at his death, Faustus must go to hell and be the servant of Lucifer: his death, the end of these twenty-four years, are counted down by a chiming clock until -
[The clock strikes twelve.]
O, it strikes, it strikes! Now, body, turn to air,
Or Lucifer will bear thee quick to hell!
[Thunder and lightning.]
O soul, be chang'd into little water-drops,
And fall into the ocean, ne'er be found!
[Enter Dᴇᴠɪʟs.]
My God, my god, look not so fierce on me!
Adders and serpents, let me breathe a while!
Ugly hell, gape not! come not, Lucifer!
I'll burn my books!—Ah, Mephistophilis!
[Exeunt Dᴇᴠɪʟs with Fᴀᴜsᴛᴜs.]
His friends pray for him, but it is too late. As the chorus of the epilogue warn,
Cut is the branch that might have grown full straight,
And burned is Apollo's laurel-bough,
That sometime grew within this learned man.
Faustus is gone:  regard his hellish fall,
Whose fiendful fortune may exhort the wise,
Only to wonder at unlawful things,
Whose deepness doth entice such forward wits
To practice more than heavenly power permits.
Such a great play! I do love Marlowe! This is an excellent play on sin and damnation: Faustus commits the ultimate sin of making a pact with the devil and, though forgiveness and redemption are always possible throughout the play Faustus turns his back on God and the Good Angel and so is punished in the end for all eternity. It is a strange meeting of the Ancient Greek tragedies, Medieval theology, and Renaissance values which makes it a fascinating work: this is the third Marlowe play I've read (the others being Dido, Queen of Carthage and Edward II) and he doesn't disappoint.

Sunday, 30 October 2016

Undine by Friedrich de la Motte Fouqué.

Undine is a fairy tale by Friedrich de la Motte Fouqué, a German writer, and was first published in 1811. It seems that de la Motte has fallen out of fashion: my edition was published by Cassell's National Library (1886-88), cheap classics essentially, and there is another edition illustrated by Arthur Rackham (1909), so one can deduce in the late 19th, early 20th Century it was popular, yet now I struggled to get much information on de la Motte and his other works. If Undine is anything to go by, this is a travesty! Undine is a fantastic work. 

Reading it, one can see the influence of Undine on The Little Mermaid by Hans Christian Andersen (1837). We meet Undine when a knight, Sir Huldbrand of Ringstetten is wandering a forest inhabited by unearthly spirits. He finds a cottage in which lives a fisherman, his wife, and their adopted daughter, the wild, beautiful, and rebellious Undine. The knight falls in love with her, and, when they marry, she reveals that she is a descendent of a water spirit:
“You must know, my own love, that there are beings in the elements which bear the strongest resemblance to the human race, and which, at the same time, but seldom become visible to you. The wonderful salamanders sparkle and sport amid the flames; deep in the earth the meagre and malicious gnomes pursue their revels; the forest-spirits belong to the air, and wander in the woods; while in the seas, rivers, and streams live the widespread race of water-spirits. These last, beneath resounding domes of crystal, through which the sky can shine with its sun and stars, inhabit a region of light and beauty; lofty coral-trees glow with blue and crimson fruits in their gardens; they walk over the pure sand of the sea, among exquisitely variegated shells, and amid whatever of beauty the old world possessed, such as the present is no more worthy to enjoy—creations which the floods covered with their secret veils of silver; and now these noble monuments sparkle below, stately and solemn, and bedewed by the water, which loves them, and calls forth from their crevices delicate moss-flowers and enwreathing tufts of sedge.
“Now the nation that dwell there are very fair and lovely to behold, for the most part more beautiful than human beings. Many a fisherman has been so fortunate as to catch a view of a delicate maiden of the waters, while she was floating and singing upon the deep. He would then spread far the fame of her beauty; and to such wonderful females men are wont to give the name of Undines. But what need of saying more?—You, my dear husband, now actually behold an Undine before you.”
She goes on to tell him that, now she is married, she at last possesses a soul. Their marriage however is ill-fated; Huldbrand returns, taking Undine with him, to the city where he is re-joined with a woman called Bertalda and soon regrets not marrying her when he had the chance.

It is very much like The Little Mermaid, as I say. Magical, beautiful prose; very other-worldly, and with a deep melancholy seen in Andersen's works. I gather Undine was part of a set of four stories: Undine was a spring tale, then The Two Captains for summer (I'm looking forward to reading this soon), Aslauga's Knight for autumn, and Sintram for winter. I know nothing more about these so I'll have to do a little digging.

Until then, here are Arthur Rackham's wonderful illustrations for Undine (1909):


Friday, 28 October 2016

Historia Brittonum by Nennius.

Facsimile of the the Vatican Manuscript 
of the Historia Brittonum
Historia Brittonum or History of the Britons is, as the title suggests, a history of Britain ascribed to Nennius, a Welsh monk living in the 9th Century. I am growing increasingly fond of reading Medieval histories having recently read Geoffrey of Monmouth's The History of the Kings of Britain (1136) and Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People (731), both of which I loved, and I thought now was the time to turn to Nennius.

A common criticism of Nennius is that he is not historically accurate: this is true, he is not even remotely historically accurate. Historia Brittonum is more a mythical history. It begins, rather sweetly I thought,
Nennius, the lowly minister and servant of the servants of God, by the grace of God, disciple of St. Elbotus, to all the followers of truth sendeth health. 
Be it known to your charity, that being dull in intellect and rude of speech, I have presumed to deliver these things in the Latin tongue, not trusting to my own learning, which is little or none at all, but partly from traditions of our ancestors, partly from writings and monuments of the ancient inhabitants of Britain, partly from the annals of the Romans, and the chronicles of the sacred fathers, Isidore, Hieronymus, Prosper, Eusebius, and from the histories of the Scots and Saxons, although our enemies, not following my own inclinations, but, to the best of my ability, obeying the commands of my seniors; I have lispingly put together this history from various sources, and have endeavoured, from shame, to deliver down to posterity the few remaining ears of corn about past transactions, that they might not be trodden under foot, seeing that an ample crop has been snatched away already by the hostile reapers of foreign nations. For many things have been in my way, and I, to this day, have hardly been able to understand, even superficially, as was necessary, the sayings of other men; much less was I able in my own strength, but like a barbarian, have I murdered and defiled the language of others. But I bore about with me an inward wound, and I was indignant, that the name of my own people, formerly famous and distinguished, should sink into oblivion, and like smoke be dissipated. But since, however, I had rather myself be the historian of the Britons than nobody, although so many are to be found who might much more satisfactorily discharge the labour thus imposed on me; I humbly entreat my readers, whose ears I may offend by the inelegance of my words, that they will fulfil the wish of my seniors, and grant me the easy task of listening with candour to my history. For zealous efforts very often fail: but bold enthusiasm, were it in its power, would not suffer me to fail. May, therefore, candour be shown where the inelegance of my words is insufficient, and may the truth of this history, which my rustic tongue has ventured, as a kind of plough, to trace out in furrows, lose none of its influence from that cause, in the ears of my hearers. For it is better to drink a wholesome draught of truth from the humble vessel, than poison mixed with honey from a golden goblet.
The piece, only forty pages long in my edition, is divided into sixty-six chapters in which Nennius starts from the age of Adam, and from there divides the history of the world into six ages:
The first age of the world is from Adam to Noah; the second from Noah to Abraham; the third from Abraham to David; the fourth from David to Daniel; the fifth to John the Baptist; the sixth from John to the judgment, when our Lord Jesus Christ will come to judge the living and the dead, and the world by fire.
And from there to the history of the Britons: "The island of Britain derives its name from Brutus, a Roman consul. Taken from the south-west point it inclines a little towards the west, and to its northern extremity measures eight hundred miles, and is in breadth two hundred." He lists the thirty-three cities, including York (Cair ebrauc), Canterbury (Cair ceint), Catterick (Cair caratauc; now a small village, I list it because I was born there and was very happy to see it mentioned!), Gloucester (Cair glout), Manchester (Cair mauiguid), and of course London (Cair londein). He then notes Britain's "inhabitants consist of four different people; the Scots, the Picts, the Saxons and the ancient Britons", then writes more on the myth of Brutus and how he came to establish Briton and the ancient Britons, and from there the Picts and how they occupied the Orkney Islands (which inspired me to read the Orkneyinga Saga, 1230, which I'll be blogging about next week), then the Scots and Saxons.

Much of Historia Brittonum consists of lists of genealogy of the kings and emperors of Rome, which, admittedly, were a little tedious, but the work is fascinating as a mythical account of the origins of Britain, and accounts of Saint Patrick, the patron saint of Ireland, Vortigern, and even an early myth of King Arthur, short enough to quote in full here:
Then it was, that the magnanimous Arthur, with all the kings and military force of Britain, fought against the Saxons. And though there were many more noble than himself, yet he was twelve times chosen their commander, and was as often conqueror. The first battle in which he was engaged, was at the mouth of the river Gleni. The second, third, fourth, and fifth, were on another river, by the Britons called Duglas, in the region Linuis. The sixth, on the river Bassas. The seventh in the wood Celidon, which the Britons call Cat Coit Celidon. The eighth was near Gurnion castle, where Arthur bore the image of the Holy Virgin, mother of God, upon his shoulders, and through the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the holy Mary, put the Saxons to flight, and pursued them the whole day with great slaughter. The ninth was at the City of Legion, which is called Cair Lion. The tenth was on the banks of the river Trat Treuroit. The eleventh was on the mountain Breguoin, which we call Cat Bregion.The twelfth was a most severe contest, when Arthur penetrated to the hill of Badon. In this engagement, nine hundred and forty fell by his hand alone, no one but the Lord affording him assistance. In all these engagements the Britons were successful. For no strength can avail against the will of the Almighty.
There is, in some editions, a final section on the 'wonders of Britain' (de mirabilibus Britanniae): my edition didn't include this and it's thought this section wasn't written by Nennius after all. I haven't found it to read online, but there is a summary by Sean B. Palmer which is most interesting and I do very much recommend people read his post. Hopefully I'll be able to read the original soon enough! I really enjoyed reading Nennius. Inaccurate as it may be, it is interesting to learn of the perceived history of the early Medieval Age; one of the many reasons to read this short work.

Wednesday, 26 October 2016

Chapters XXI - XXIII of The Pickwick Papers by Charles Dickens.

Greyfriars Kirk, Edinburgh.
It is October 1836 and it is snowing. Edinburgh records up to five inches of snow on the 28th October, and in London about an inch has fallen: this is just the beginning of one of the coldest and indeed snowiest winters on record in the United Kingdom. This period, and the perhaps unusually snowy periods of Charles Dickens' youth influenced us more than we realise in our dreams of a white Christmas, something I will write a little about in December, but not now; after all, only a few inches have fallen so far...

October 1836 also saw the return of Charles Darwin: he arrived in Falmouth in Cornwall on HMS Beagle having collected data to develop the theory of evolution (in January 1836, two months before the first instalment of Pickwick Papers, Darwin had just arrived in Australia). And, of course, October 1836 saw the eighth instalment of The Pickwick Papers.

Chapter XXI
In which the Old Man Launches Forth into his Favourite Theme, 
and Relates a Story About a Queer Client

'The Last Visit of Heyling to the Old Man'
by Phiz.
In the seventh instalment we left Mr. Pickwick in a state of alarm, having been informed by the solicitors Dodson and Fogg that he is to be sued for £1,500 for breach of promise. To steady his nerves he takes a brandy and warm water at Gray's Inn where he meets Jack Bamber, who was on the point of telling a tale when the instalment concluded. After a month of waiting we now learn what Jack has to say: after some brief ghost stories, perfect for Halloween, he tells The Old Man's Tale about the Queer Client. It begins,
‘It matters little,’ said the old man, ‘where, or how, I picked up this brief history. If I were to relate it in the order in which it reached me, I should commence in the middle, and when I had arrived at the conclusion, go back for a beginning. It is enough for me to say that some of its circumstances passed before my own eyes; for the remainder I know them to have happened, and there are some persons yet living, who will remember them but too well. 
‘In the Borough High Street, near St. George’s Church, and on the same side of the way, stands, as most people know, the smallest of our debtors’ prisons, the Marshalsea. Although in later times it has been a very different place from the sink of filth and dirt it once was, even its improved condition holds out but little temptation to the extravagant, or consolation to the improvident. The condemned felon has as good a yard for air and exercise in Newgate, as the insolvent debtor in the Marshalsea Prison. 
‘It may be my fancy, or it may be that I cannot separate the place from the old recollections associated with it, but this part of London I cannot bear. The street is broad, the shops are spacious, the noise of passing vehicles, the footsteps of a perpetual stream of people—all the busy sounds of traffic, resound in it from morn to midnight; but the streets around are mean and close; poverty and debauchery lie festering in the crowded alleys; want and misfortune are pent up in the narrow prison; an air of gloom and dreariness seems, in my eyes at least, to hang about the scene, and to impart to it a squalid and sickly hue.
‘Many eyes, that have long since been closed in the grave, have looked round upon that scene lightly enough, when entering the gate of the old Marshalsea Prison for the first time; for despair seldom comes with the first severe shock of misfortune. A man has confidence in untried friends, he remembers the many offers of service so freely made by his boon companions when he wanted them not; he has hope—the hope of happy inexperience—and however he may bend beneath the first shock, it springs up in his bosom, and flourishes there for a brief space, until it droops beneath the blight of disappointment and neglect. How soon have those same eyes, deeply sunken in the head, glared from faces wasted with famine, and sallow from confinement, in days when it was no figure of speech to say that debtors rotted in prison, with no hope of release, and no prospect of liberty! The atrocity in its full extent no longer exists, but there is enough of it left to give rise to occurrences that make the heart bleed.
He goes on to tell of a man imprisoned, forced to watch his wife and child starve to death, and who vows revenge on those who imprisoned him, his father and father-in-law. When his father dies the man inherits, and so is released from prison a rich man. First, he watches his brother-in-law drown whilst his father-in-law begs for help, then he buys his father-in-laws debts, making his life yet more miserable. When he finally tells his father-in-law that this is his revenge, the father-in-law dies. The story concludes,
‘Beneath a plain gravestone, in one of the most peaceful and secluded churchyards in Kent, where wild flowers mingle with the grass, and the soft landscape around forms the fairest spot in the garden of England, lie the bones of the young mother and her gentle child. But the ashes of the father do not mingle with theirs; nor, from that night forward, did the attorney ever gain the remotest clue to the subsequent history of his queer client.’
And with that, Bamber leaves, followed by Mr. Pickwick and Sam Weller.

Chapter XXII
Mr. Pickwick Journeys To Ipswich And Meets with a Romantic Adventure with a 
Middle-aged Lady in Yellow Curl-Papers

'The Middle Aged Lady in the Double-Bedded
Room' by Phiz.
After that thoroughly miserable 21st chapter, we have an awkward interlude: Mr. Pickwick again finds himself in a scrape not befitting to his dignity. One night whilst staying at an inn, following dinner with a Mr. Peter Magnus Pickwick retires to bed, however realises he has left his watch in the dining room. He goes to retrieve the watch however is unable to find his way back to his bedroom. After several attempts to find that right bedroom he succeeds, or at least he thinks he does, and settles down in bed, but then -
... he was suddenly stopped by a most unexpected interruption: to wit, the entrance into the room of some person with a candle, who, after locking the door, advanced to the dressing-table, and set down the light upon it. 
The smile that played on Mr. Pickwick’s features was instantaneously lost in a look of the most unbounded and wonder-stricken surprise. The person, whoever it was, had come in so suddenly and with so little noise, that Mr. Pickwick had had no time to call out, or oppose their entrance. Who could it be? A robber? Some evil-minded person who had seen him come upstairs with a handsome watch in his hand, perhaps. What was he to do? 
The only way in which Mr. Pickwick could catch a glimpse of his mysterious visitor with the least danger of being seen himself, was by creeping on to the bed, and peeping out from between the curtains on the opposite side. To this manoeuvre he accordingly resorted. Keeping the curtains carefully closed with his hand, so that nothing more of him could be seen than his face and nightcap, and putting on his spectacles, he mustered up courage and looked out.
It is a middle aged lady who, to Pickwick's horror, proceeds to get herself ready for bed. After a very painful few minutes of wondering what he should do, he reveals himself and gets booted out of the room accordingly where he waits for Sam Weller to rescue him.

Chapter XXIII 
In Which Mr. Samuel Weller Begins to Devote his Energies to the 
Return Match between Himself and Mr. Trotter

In the final chapter of this instalment the search for Mr. Jingle and Mr. Trotter continues. There are some terse words exchanged between Sam Weller and his father, and eventually Sam manages to catch up with Trotter:
‘Hollo, you Sir!’ shouted Sam fiercely.
The stranger stopped.
‘Hollo!’ repeated Sam, still more gruffly.
The man with the horrible face looked, with the greatest surprise, up the court, and down the court, and in at the windows of the houses—everywhere but at Sam Weller—and took another step forward, when he was brought to again by another shout.
‘Hollo, you sir!’ said Sam, for the third time.
There was no pretending to mistake where the voice came from now, so the stranger, having no other resource, at last looked Sam Weller full in the face.
‘It won’t do, Job Trotter,’ said Sam. ‘Come! None o’ that ‘ere nonsense. You ain’t so wery ‘andsome that you can afford to throw avay many o’ your good looks. Bring them ‘ere eyes o’ yourn back into their proper places, or I’ll knock ‘em out of your head. D’ye hear?’
Trotter reveals no information about Jingle's plans, but he does share one thing of interest, his new relationship with a cook "who has saved up a little money". Weller then tells him in no uncertain terms to meet him in the Great White Horse public house at eight o' clock that evening. Trotter leaves, and Weller tells Pickwick he has a plan, however the chapter finishes with the words "Whether it was done in good time, or not, will be seen hereafter." We must wait for November's instalment...

Tuesday, 25 October 2016

“Enter Ghost": Top Ten Creepy Shakespeare Quotes for Halloween.

This week's Top Ten Tuesday is a Halloween freebie and I can't resist! Here are some of my favourite creepy Shakespeare quotes, full of dark omens, owls, ghosts, and sprites...


1) From Hamlet (1603)




2) From Macbeth (1606)



3) From Henry IV Part I (1597)




4) From Julius Caesar (1599)


☠  ☠
☠  ☠

6) From Henry VI Part III (1591)


☠  ☠

7) From Macbeth (1606)


☠  ☠

8) From Macbeth (1606)


☠  ☠

9) From A Midsummer Night's Dream (1600)


☠  ☠

10) From The Rape of Lucrece (1594)


☠  ☠

Happy Halloween!

The Plays of Terence.

Publius Terentius Afer, or Terence as he is best known, is a 2nd Century B.C. Roman dramatist, possibly of Libyan descent, born around 184 B.C. and dying about 159 B.C. at the very young age of 25. He wrote six comedies in his short life, all of which have survived:
  • Andria (The Girl from Andros, 166 B.C.)
  • Hecyra (The Mother-in-Law, 165 B.C.)
  • Heauton Timorumenos (The Self-Tormentor, 163 B.C.)
  • Eunuchus (The Eunuch, 161 B.C.)
  • Phormio (161 B.C.)
  • Adelphoe (The Brothers, 160 B.C.)
I've been spending the past few weeks reading them, and because, though I enjoyed these comedies, I don't have a great amount to say about them, so I thought it best say a little about them in one post rather than in six separate posts. That said, I have already read Andria and given that a separate post, so here are my thoughts on the remaining five plays:

Hecyra, or The Mother-in-Law

Hecyra, or The Mother-in-Law was Terence's second play which was first performed in 165 B.C. however, oddly enough, it wasn't performed without interruption until 160 B.C. It was inspired by a play by Apollodorus of Carystus (also titled Hekyra, or The Mother-in-Law) and is about a young man, Pamphilus, the son of Laches and Sostra, who has fallen in love with a prostitute, Bacchis. Nevertheless he is rather struck by Philumena (the daughter of Phidippus and Myrrhina) and one day he rapes her, and takes her from her a ring which he gives to Bacchis. A short time passes, and Pamphilus agrees to an arranged marriage: his wife will be Philumena, the woman he raped, however she has kept this a secret and Pamphilus is unaware it was she he raped. Now Pamphilus is married Bacchis rejects him, and so he becomes increasingly in love with his new wife. Philumena meanwhile realises she is pregnant from the rape and is in fear her secret will be discovered, especially by Sostra, the mother-in-law of the title, who is left wondering why Philumena has apparently become very much against her. It is of course inevitable that the secret will be discovered, but I shall leave it there for readers to find out!

Heauton Timorumenos, or The Self-Tormentor

Heauton Timorumenos was first performed in 163 B.C. and appears to be inspired by Menander's play of the same title (only fragments survive of Menander's play so it is difficult to make that judgement). The 'self-tormentor' of the play is Menedemus, who in the first part of the play explains to his neighbour Chremes that his son Clinia has gone to the east as a soldier having taken a good telling off a little more to heart than Menedemus intended. When Clinia returns, accompanied by Clitipho, Chremes' son, he begs that Chremes doesn't tell Menedemus he has returned. Clinia is then reunited with his lover Antiphila (this relationship originally incurred Menedemus' wrath), who is accompanied by Bacchis, a prostitute with whom Clitipho is in love. Neither of the men want their fathers to find out about their lovers, and they are aided by Chremes' slave Syrus, who is very much like an ancient Roman Jeeves. What follows is a rather confusing account of Chremes essentially trying to sort everyone out and tell everyone what they should and should not be doing, whilst Syrus attempts to enable the various affairs. The irony is that Chremes, apparently so moral, has a secret of his own that his wife Sostra is on the point of exposing, and as he tries to organise everyone he is unaware of the many plots in his own household. It is a very complicated play indeed, perhaps a little too complicated to enjoy.

Eunuchus, or The Eunuch

Eunuchus was first performed in 161 B.C. with unprecedented success. It's essentially a re-write of Menander's play Eunouchos and tells the story of a young man, Phaedria, and his lover Thais (a prostitute): Parmeno, the slave of Phaedria, acts as an adviser to Phaedria during his stormy relationship. At the start of the play Phaedria is lamenting over his recent argument with Thais whilst Parmeno consoles and advises him. Thais then appears and we learn of the soldier Thraso who is interested in her, and he is very rich. He intends to give Thais a slave girl, Pamphila, who in fact is Thais' sister, unbeknown to Thraso. Thais plans to then return Pamphila to her brother Chremes. Nevetheless Phaedria is worried by it all and longs to marry Thais, and to prove his love he gives her two gifts: an Ethiopian slave girl and a eunuch.

Later, when Pamphila arrives, Phaedria's brother Chaerea falls for her on the moment he sees her, and, at the port, tries to follow her but loses her in the crowd. Parmeno however is able to guide him to her, telling him of the story. So that he may be close to her he decides that he will replace the eunuch to get access to the house. When he is finally alone with her he is apparently overcome and rapes her, which threatens to ruin the household. Phaedria intervenes however and, as comedies go, everything is sorted out in the end.

Phormio

Phormio was first performed in the same year as The Eunuch, in 161 B.C., and, like Hecyra it was based on a play by Apollodorus of Carystus; Epidikazomenos, or The Claimant. In it we meet two brothers,  Demipho and Chremes, the latter of whom is married to Nausistrata, and together they have a son, Phaedria (hard now to ignore that Terence recycles many names for his plays). Each year Chremes travels to Lemnos to collect the rent of his wife's various properties, and each time he stays longer than is necessary and brings home less than he ought. His wife suspects nothing more than incompetence, but it is revealed that he has in fact a second 'wife' and a daughter, Phanium, and furthermore in Lemnos he is known by the name Stilpho. Demipho, meanwhile, has a son - Antipho, and it's agreed that he should marry Phanium, and pass her off as the daughter of a friend. However Geta, a slave, rather scuppers the plans after the two sons, spoilt and unpleasant, make his life difficult. When Demipho and Chremes return from Lemnos they find the pair virtually uncontrollable and in love with unsuitable women. Antipho meanwhile falls in love with a girl, who turns out to be Phanium, but her maid Sophrona tells him she will not consent to Phanium leaving her care except in marriage. This risks revealing Chremes' secret, but, with the help of Phormio, a rather shady character who goes on to exploit the miseries of the other characters, they manage to come up with a plan. This is I think my least favourite of Terence's plays: too complicated to be enjoyable.

Adelphoe, or The Brothers

Adelphoe is Terence's final play and was first performed in 160 B.C. As with The Eunuch, The Self-Tormentor, and The Girl from Andros, this play was inspired by a work of Menander's, this time Adelphoi as well as a play from another author - Diphilus (his work again of the same title Adelphoi). The brothers of the title are Demea and Micio, and Demea decides to split up his two sons Aeschinus and Ctesipho: Dema will raise Ctesipho, and Micio Aeschinus with the object of seeing which makes the better father, both with sharply contrasting methods. Aeschinus ends up raping a girl, Pamphila, the daughter of Sostrata, and must now marry her. Meanwhile Ctesipho, brought up very strictly by Dema, falls in love with a slave. To protect his brother Aeschinus takes responsibility for Ctesipho's actions, however Sostrata is made aware and believes that Aeschinus is on the point of deserting her daughter, who has now given birth. Things typically get very complicated very quickly, though the resolution is still somewhat of a surprise.

Terence's plays are typically the comedies of old: highly complicated and farcical at times, though occasionally mildly amusing. He is not my favourite playwright by any stretch, but I think it's important to read him given his influence on some of our most famous writers, Shakespeare, Molière, Wycherley, and Udall in particular. The morality of the plays, frequently centred around rape, are highly questionable, some excuse them simply as they show immorality very well, and it is certainly eye opening to read of ancient attitudes towards rape. I'm glad I've finally read Terence and, though it's unlikely I'll ever revisit them, they can at times be fairly good fun.

Monday, 24 October 2016

Exiles by James Joyce.

Exiles is James Joyce's only play, completed in 1915 and first published in 1918 between A Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man (1916) and Ulysses (1922), and, like Portrait of an Artist, it is rather autobiographical. Unfortunately, it's generally agreed to be his least successful work.

Exiles tells the story of Richard Rowan (a writer), his common-law wife Bertha and his friend Robert Hand, and Robert's cousin Beatrice, recently recovered from a life-threatening illness. Richard and Bertha have recently returned to Dublin from Rome. We find Bertha jealous of the close relationship of Richard and Beatrice; Robert, meanwhile, is jealous of Richard and Bertha. Robert attempts to seduce Bertha, Bertha tells Richard and he advises her to do what is right for her. When they meet again, following an awkward moment between Richard and Robert, Bertha and Robert are left alone, and what occurs is largely left to the audience's imagination. As this love-triangle plays out, Richard must also decide whether or not to settle down in Dublin and teach at the university or live, as Joyce himself did, as an 'exile'.

It is a fairly simple play, certainly not the finest I've read by a long stretch, but entertaining enough. Joyce was very influenced by Ibsen, and from the little I've read of Ibsen I see this in Exiles, the psychological drama of conflict imposed on these exiles living almost on the edge of society, their unusual relationships very much outside the norm, and their various attempts at a resolution. Because I've read so little Ibsen I'll have to refrain from saying any more on that topic and simply recommend an article from the New York Times - Revaluing James Joyce's 'Exiles' by James T. Farrell (1946). It is an entertaining play, I dare say memorable (though time will tell), but I can see why this is James Joyce's least popular work. Still, it's a must-read for Joyce fans, and I'd be curious to know what Ibsen fans make of it.

Exiles was my 43rd title for the Deal Me In Challenge. Next week: Marina by T. S. Eliot.

*******
Further Reading

Saturday, 22 October 2016

Dewey's Readathon.

It's readathon day, and perfect reading weather. Last night was the lowest temperature of the season, just 1 °C, and it will no doubt get much lower as the days go by. Right now it's very misty, low cloud, quite smokey from people's chimneys, yet behind all this cloud the sun is fighting its way through, so the light here is a very beautiful pale gold (I wish I had batteries in my camera!). Temperature-wise it's pretty chilly, so I'm looking forward to sitting in front of the fire and reading.

All that said, I'll have to be an unofficial participant today: for one reason I can't stay up to late tonight, and another, if it does get a little more hospitable outside I will have to go out and plant some more bulbs. I wanted all my spring bulbs planted before the end of October and I still have a lot to go. I do think it's quite likely I'll have to break, as I type the sun is getting much brighter, though I still can't quite see it! 

Because of this expected interruption I have made an early start with reading today, though the readathon doesn't begin until 1 pm my time (8 am EDT). So far I've finished Antony and Cleopatra by William Shakespeare (I only had Act V to go to be honest), and I've read Nennius' History of the Britons, which is absolutely tiny (41 pages, large print, but I did like it however inaccurate it was!). As for other plans, I have a few lists: firstly, books I really really want to read today:
  1. The Song of Roland.
  2. La Vita Nuova by Dante.
  3. The Knight of the Burning Pestle by Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher.
  4. News from Nowhere by William Morris.
  5. Effi Briest by Theodor Fontane.
  6. Symposium by Plato.
Other books, let's call them 'back-up books' or 'if there's time books':
  1. In Praise of Folly by Erasmus.
  2. The Duchess of Malfi by John Webster.
  3. The Vicar of Wakefield by Oliver Goldsmith.
  4. Confessions of an Opium Eater by Thomas de Quincey.
  5. Animal Farm by George Orwell.
  6. Ralph Roister Doister by Nicholas Udall.
Finally, books I'd like to at least start, but there's no way I'll be able to read the entire book in one sitting:
  1. The Prime Minister by Anthony Trollope.
  2. The Devils by Dostoyevsky.
  3. Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens.
So, I shall press on, and I think I'll start with The Song of Roland. I'll update later today, and perhaps join in with a few of those questionnaires.

Good luck and have fun to all those participating! :)

Update: Despite not updating until now, 10 am, I have been reading a fair amount! Yesterday was on and off rain so I didn't plant my bulbs, instead I was able to read more or less all day. Here's what I read:

  1. The Song of Roland.
  2. Fathers and Sons by Ivan Turgenev.
  3. Keep the Aspidistra Flying by George Orwell.
  4. La Vita Nuova by Dante.
  5. News from Nowhere by William Morris.
  6. The Knight of the Burning Pestle by Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher.
  7. The Duchess of Malfi by John Webster.
There are three hours left, and if it were raining I'd say with confidence that I would read the Orkneyinga Saga in that time, but the weather is fine and sunny (though very cold) and I do need to plant those bulbs. So I shall do so, then later on today I'll have some time for more reading. I hope I'll read the Orkneyinga Saga and, if there's time, just one more little book, but I fear that might be a stretch! I could perhaps read a play, in which case I'd read Ralph Roister Doister. Having said all that I'll probably not even get to start anything! But I live in hope... 

I hope everyone is having a good time still! Well done to all those who have been up all night :)

Friday, 21 October 2016

The Masterpiece by Émile Zola.

The Masterpiece (L'Œuvre) is, in publication order, the fourteenth of Émile Zola's Rougon-Macquart novels, first published in 1886 following Germinal. In it Zola continues to follow the lives of the Rougon-Macquarts, a fictional family in the time of the Second French Empire (1852–1870). In this novel, set between 1855 - 1870, we follow Claude Lantier, the son of Auguste Lantier and Gervaise Coupeau née Macquart (her story is told in L'Assommoir), and the brother of Etienne (Germinal), Jacques (The Beast Within) and Anna (better known as the famous Nana).

In L'Assommoir young Claude is adopted by an old man in Plassans (the 'seat' of the Rougon Macquarts) during a period of extreme poverty for his mother and her new husband:
An old gentleman at Plassans offered to take the older boy, Claude, and send him to an academy down there. The old man, who loved art, had previously been much impressed by Claude's sketches. Claude had already begun to cost them quite a bit.
This is virtually the last we hear of him in L'Assommoir, save a brief comment towards to the end that his brother Etienne "never mentioned Claude who was still in the south". Claude Lantier also has a role in the third novel of the series The Belly of Paris (1873, the third novel in publication order) where we learn that he is now an artist but it is not until The Masterpiece we learn his full story. In itself it is an interesting one, but it's made all the more interesting knowing its inspiration.

In The Masterpiece we see Claude in Paris with his friends Louis Dubuche and Pierre Sandoz: oddly enough it was in Freud's Interpretation of Dreams (Die Traumdeutung, 1899) that I learned the significance of the name "Sandoz":
In the novel of an artist's life, L'Œuvre, whose subject-matter must have suggested itself to my dream-thoughts, it is well known that the writer has portrayed himself and his own family happiness in certain episodes, appearing in this role under the name Sandoz. He probably reached this change of name along the following route. If we were to reverse Zola (as children like to do), we get Aloz. That was probably not sufficiently disguised for him; so he replaced the syllable Al, which also introduces the same Alexander [or perhaps Alexandrine, the name of Zola's wife], by the third syllable of that name, sand, and that is how Sandoz came about.
Paul Alexis reading to Émile Zola by Paul Cézanne (1869–70).
Sandoz was indeed Zola's fictional counterpart, whereas Claude was largely inspired by Zola's old friend Paul Cézanne (as well as Claude Monet and Édouard Manet). Claude is a struggling artist, like his close circle of friends comprising largely of artists and writers. In the beginning of the book he meets Christine, a woman who combines modesty and sensuality, and they develop a relationship as Christine agrees to model for him, and eventually they have a son, Jacques. Claude's intense struggle to achieve fame and produce great art is partly owning to the clash of his style with accepted tastes of the age, something his friends suffer from too. Claude's obsession however takes over his very self, his mania reflecting patterns of behaviour seen in other members of his family such as the Rougon Macquart matriarch Adélaïde Rougon (The Fortune of the Rougons and Doctor Pascal), as well as Marthe Mouret (The Conquest of Plassans), Serge Mouret (The Sin of Abbé Mouret), Angélique Rougon (The Dream), and others (the theme of heredity is crucial in understanding Zola's Rougon-Macquart novels). He gradually dehumanises and objectifies Christine seems hardly to care of her suffering, only his own when the Salon finds him a laughing stock at the works he has produced, and he neglects his son with terrible consequences.

It is perhaps no wonder, then, that Paul Cézanne cut all ties with his childhood friend, his final letter he ever sent to Zola saying,
Gardanne, April 4 1886 
Mon cher Émile, 
I’ve just received L’Œuvre, which you were kind enough to send me. I thank the author of the Rougon-Macquart for this kind token of remembrance, and ask him to allow me to wish him well, thinking of years gone by. 
Ever yours with the feeling of time passing, 
Paul Cézanne
Other artists of Zola's circle were disgruntled: Jean-Baptiste-Antoine Guillemet wrote to Zola, "In your last book [The Masterpiece] I see only sadness or impotence... God forbid that members of the little gang, as your mother used to call us, should recognise themselves in your characters. Mean-spirited, they are of little interest." Claude Monet wrote more kindly,
Though you made certain that none of your characters should resemble any one of us, I am still afraid that our enemies in the press and in the public at large may sieze this pretext to call Manet and the rest of us failures - which, I must believe, was not your intention.
Zola's novel of the Impressionists portrayed them as mad failures, it was a risk that cost him a great deal. Though I did enjoy The Masterpiece and I greatly admire this portrayal of a man descending into madness, I can't help but feel it wasn't quite worth it. For that, I am always very uncomfortable with this novel. Nevertheless, not quite masterpiece, it is an excellent work.

Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe by Édouard Manet (1863).
This painting is fictionalised in The Masterpiece as Claude Lantier's Plein Air.
*******
Further Reading

Thursday, 20 October 2016

Great Expectations by Charles Dickens.

Great Expectations by Charles Dickens is one of my favourite all-time books. It was only the second Dickens I ever read (the first being Hard Times, which I read for my A' Levels) and I wanted to revisit it, and somehow it does feel like a perfect autumn read.

Great Expectations was Charles Dickens' thirteenth and penultimate completed novel, first serialised from  December 1860 to August 1861 in All the Year Round, then published in three volumes in October 1861. It begins on Christmas Eve (around 1812) with one of the most famous opening sentences in literature:
My father’s family name being Pirrip, and my Christian name Philip, my infant tongue could make of both names nothing longer or more explicit than Pip. So, I called myself Pip, and came to be called Pip.
Young Pip, an orphan living with his sister Mrs. Joe Gargery and her husband Joe Gargery, is here in a graveyard where he has a terrifying encounter with an escaped convict:
A fearful man, all in coarse gray, with a great iron on his leg. A man with no hat, and with broken shoes, and with an old rag tied round his head. A man who had been soaked in water, and smothered in mud, and lamed by stones, and cut by flints, and stung by nettles, and torn by briars; who limped, and shivered, and glared, and growled; and whose teeth chattered in his head as he seized me by the chin.
Miss Havisham played by
Helena Bonham Carter (2012).
The convict is soon captured and life goes on, and not long after Pip is invited to the mansion of Miss Havisham, for me one of the most memorable of Dickens' great characters, and her adopted daughter Estella:
She [Miss Havisham] was dressed in rich materials,—satins, and lace, and silks,—all of white. Her shoes were white. And she had a long white veil dependent from her hair, and she had bridal flowers in her hair, but her hair was white. Some bright jewels sparkled on her neck and on her hands, and some other jewels lay sparkling on the table. Dresses, less splendid than the dress she wore, and half-packed trunks, were scattered about. She had not quite finished dressing, for she had but one shoe on,—the other was on the table near her hand,—her veil was but half arranged, her watch and chain were not put on, and some lace for her bosom lay with those trinkets, and with her handkerchief, and gloves, and some flowers, and a Prayer-Book all confusedly heaped about the looking-glass.
Pip, after months of visiting Miss Havisham, begins to fall in love with the cold, cruel-hearted Estella, but his childish hopes of marrying her and becoming a gentleman are dashed when Miss Havisham arranges an apprenticeship for him, giving Joe money to secure his future as a blacksmith. As time passes Pip, with the help of Biddy, who has come to care for Pip's sister, recently attacked and now a mute invalid, he begins to read and write, until one day Mr. Jaggers, a lawyer, arrives and gives him the stunning news that a wealthy benefactor given Pip a very large sum of money, and he must go to London to be a gentleman:
"I am instructed to communicate to him," said Mr. Jaggers, throwing his finger at me sideways, "that he will come into a handsome property. Further, that it is the desire of the present possessor of that property, that he be immediately removed from his present sphere of life and from this place, and be brought up as a gentleman,—in a word, as a young fellow of great expectations."
The first chapter of Great Expectations
in
All the Year Round.
Pip's life changes radically as he builds his new life in London and readjusts to his great change in circumstances. We see him grow from a young boy to a man, and it is not an easy road. Dickens, on the whole, is a pleasure to read, humorous, and with vivid though at times caricature-like characters (which is not a criticism), but there are some very serious underlying themes and Dickens presents a very keen psychological portrait of a young man thrust into a new world. Pip had always been an ambitious boy, learning to read and wishing he could better himself, but when the chance arises it there are many times he really lets himself down: one memorable scene is his snobbish embarrassment at the kindly Joe Gargery when the latter visits him in London. Pip describes his reaction to the news Joe will be coming to London:
Not with pleasure, though I was bound to him by so many ties; no; with considerable disturbance, some mortification, and a keen sense of incongruity. If I could have kept him away by paying money, I certainly would have paid money. 
He later describes feeling "impatient of him and out of temper with him". It is a painful scene, and just one example of Great Expectations not being a jolly account of a rags to riches story. Whilst learning to become a gentleman, Pip must learn humility, and acceptance too as his luck at times appears to be a curse. It's a wonderful book, one of Dickens' finest and most popular then as now.



*******
Further Reading


*******

N.B. For those participating in the Pickwick Papers Read-Along - I haven't forgotten about the 8th instalment, there'll be a post up next week!

Most Recent Post

Jude the Obscure by Thomas Hardy.

A few hours ago I finished Jude the Obscure by Thomas Hardy, the final novel Hardy wrote (though he did re-write The Well-Beloved a few...